I'll admit that I have heaps to learn, but am happy to learn it. I'm by far nowhere near being a brilliant player. I probably do overuse the term P2W and it's why I've said that WOWS falls more into the pay4advantge or as you put it (really well) pay2grindless. How about you get evidence to back up your side of the post. It almost seems like you're just trying to defend spending hundreds of $/£/€ on a videogame. It seems all WOWS fanboys seem to fall back on the "muh evidence" defence when given a convincing argument then blurt out "but that only works if you have skill!" Even though I've repeatedly stated that this advantage only exists against equally skilled players but you either seem to be skim reading or simply ignoring this statement. Is the ability to buy currency to fund buying signals that give you a tangible percentage advantage in battle not evidence enough. So still no evidence for any P2W here? Is it not tiresome to keep pusing a cart with a dead horse tied to it? What sort of "evidence" do you want? Schlomo Shekelshoastein a écrit : Sweet salty tears
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |